Yabberz for AndroidDownload
      Voters wait in line past the 7 p.m. closing time in a north Atlanta suburb on last day of early voting in Georgia in November 2016.


      A new report provides information of voters being kicked off of voting rolls in those states which have shown a long history of discrimination. There is speculation that his may be one of the effects of the gutting of the Voting Rights Act.

      Voters are being deleted from the rolls at a significantly higher rate than they were a decade ago, creating the possibility that an increasing number of citizens will be disenfranchised in the 2018 midterm elections and beyond.

      According to a new study from the Brennan Center for Justice, nearly 4 million more names were deleted from the rolls between 2014 and 2016 than in a comparable period between 2006 and 2008—a 33 percent increase that far outpaces the increase in the number of eligible voters.

      The Brennan Report emphasized how states with a history of racial discrimination have purged rolls more aggressively than other states.

      Nine southern states previously had to get approval from the Department of Justice to change voting policies under a provision in the 1965 Voting Rights Act, but the Supreme Court struck down that measure in 2013.

      The center highlighted Texas, Georgia and Virginia as states impacted by the 2013 Supreme Court ruling with higher rates of voter purging.

      While careful purging is a necessary part of election administration, aggressive purges have long been used as a voter suppression tool, and often target poor and minority voters at significantly higher rates.


      Study: States with racial discrimination history purge voter rolls more aggressively

      © Getty Images


      This year's mid-term elections may stymie voters who plan to vote, if when they reach their polls they discover that they are no longer registered.

      Myrna Pérez , an attorney at the Brennan Center and one of the report’s authors wrote in a New York Times op-ed Friday. “These voters may have to cast provisional ballots. Or worse, they could be turned away.”

      Aggressive voter purges are emerging as a new and critical front in battles over voting rights. For several years now, a small group of conservative activists have used the threat of litigation to scare counties into removing more people from the rolls, even filing lawsuits to force counties to use more aggressive purges. And last month, Ohio won a case before the Supreme Court that its aggressive purging program legal nationwide.

      Under the Trump administration, the problem is likely to get worse. Rather than intervening to stop aggressive purges, the Justice Department under Attorney General Jeff Sessions is taking steps to support the conservative activists urging more aggressive ones.

      The Supreme Court gutted the 1965 Voting Rights Act five years ago. Since then, a number of voter suppression actions have occurred in certain states; such as sending notices to Democratic voting precincts that elections were being held on a date other than the authentic one; decreasing voting times and dates in targeted districts, and now high purge rates.

      . . . the Supreme Court gutted the law in Shelby County v. Holder, and states and counties previously under preclearance were free to amend their laws without approval. The result is a long list of new laws and other changes that disproportionately affect minorities.

      This report provides us with one more reason Democrats must fight hard against installing Kavanaugh into the SCOTUS





      more less
      Pundit Post

      Playmates And Pornstars And Payments.......And Putin


          I was going to title the piece 'Boobs' but thought better of it, Trump is already a monumental tit and has turned the US presidency into a tabloid mess, where the politics of the global world are in flux, the same global world that America has been a chief architect of and both benefited from and paid a heavy price.

          When people talk about America and what it is in the contemporary there is little thought of sacrifice and a superiority once a give in. Nowadays the world sees a nation that is at war with the truth, those who scream fake news and those who are unrelenting in making sure that despite the lie of alternative facts, the reality of what is going on is never muted nor hidden amongst the massive human flaws and failings of the current lesser presidency and all the noises that come with the madness.

          The madness that has ensued from the Lesser President declaring Russia the winner of the Cold War by looking and behaving like no president has done before in the face of the clear danger and malice of the Russian state.

          His spineless display that was seen in Helsinki and the subsequent walk back of the walk back of the original walk back to the first walk back was utterly shameful. Everything since has only further increased the notion and the growing belief that the lesser president is a tainted one and more terrifyingly for the world in the debt of foreign actors whose intentions towards the US, Europe and further afield are not for the good of mankind, but a dangerous hate filled attempt to redress the scores of old.

          All this time the lesser president keeps his ignorant base hooked on the line of a modern age 1950's America, that despite the realities of the modern global world is nothing but a nostalgic yearning for the unattainable and the lost. Lost to the capitalism that once fuelled the 1950's lost utopia to some, that same capitalism responsible for the profit driven inhuman greed whose greatest victims are those who stand behind a symbol of that greed, a bastard child of greed and unabashed shame laid bare to all in the shape of their lesser president.

          Laid bare the sins of an uncaring new father who had unprotected sex with numerous women weeks after his third wife had given birth to his fifth child, the fifth from three different mothers and wives for whom he cheated on all of them.

          The great lies of evangelical christians exposed as they worship at the feet of their new lord and saviour. Maybe they find comfort in hiding their own hypocrisies behind the most hypocritical of all. Those who claim to have the moral authority of family and marriage and those who live by the fake christianity.

          The lord jesus christ who died for your sins and who wants to have men marrying women and having babies and women in their place.....all standard for those most vocal on morality exposing themselves as lying cretins and false preachers who have no moral authority other than the one they sell - not metaphorically but in actuality.

          Their lying souls sold to the man who sells souls for cover.

          Cover for the crimes of the immorality that is enemy number one in the evangelical ideology. Where before the morality of other leaders was meat for the 'American Jesus Beast' and the fabric 0f moral America cracked and snapped at the spectre of semen stains and a blue dress and the sordid details of the Oval Office and a game of 'hide the cigar' had these good living folks believing the antichrist was in the Oval Office and being fellated by interns.

          It is only stark evidence that these little cretins of cash christ are as rotten as the man they worship and swoon over. The man who right now is using his closet of many skeletons to take away from the mortal danger of dealing with a cold blooded murdering leader in the form of the journalist, political rival, dissenting voice LGBT, wife beating enabler known as Putin.

          The world knows that the lesser president is dirty and corrupted to the point of being a danger to every American man woman and child. Hiding his highly questioned meeting behind the immorality of his unloving uncaring past.

          That immorality evidently not meeting once lofty held standards on the morality scale by those whose deal will allow them to mete out their own brand of morality, the subjugation of women and the LGBT community, black and brown, muslim and other deemed outside the Cretin Christ small tent.

          A drip drip of scandal and crimes committed used to hide the greater crimes yet to be announced is nothing more than the game of a lesser president caught in a mess of his own creation.

          With that constant drip and a base remaining stable despite his surrender to Russia in Helsinki........



          Be comfortable in the fact that coming out from all this evidence there will be payments for his extramarital affairs and these payments will include receipts for abortions. You see the lesser president and his need to use his private misdeeds to hide his political ineptitudes it is only a matter of time before those most loyal and so far very forgiving will be truly tested when they realise payments were made to women for abortion procedures to cover his little man's libido.

          It is only a matter of time.

          more less
          Pundit Post

          Warning: Why Republicans Are Upbeat About November Elections


              At a Republican Conference this week, Republicans were upbeat about the midterm elections in spite of the negative reactions to the Trump-Putin meeting in Helsinki. Naming "pressure from progressives challenging the Democratic old guard" as the main reason, Republicans believe that they can exploit such differences to maintain control of the Senate and the House of Representatives. "They're their own worst enemy, and I'm very comfortable with that," said Terry Lathan, Chair of the Republican party in Alabama.


              Delegate Henry Barbour of Mississippi (R) speaks with reporters at the Republican National Committee Spring Meeting at the Diplomat Resort in Hollywood, Florida, April 21, 2016. REUTERS/Joe Skipper/File Photo


              However, Democrats are confident that they have the edge in the upcoming midterm elections, citing enthusiasm, organization and energy, which is devoted to taking the needed seats in both chambers in order to defeat the Trump/Pence continuation of policies detrimental to the American people.

              Tom Perez says: "Everywhere I go I see the [Democratic] troops in action."

              As long as Democrats band together and vote in huge numbers, (and if states can keep Russian Hackers from changing votes,) I agree with Tom Perez.


              Republicans at a conference in Texas this week had reason to feel downcast, even panicky as President Donald Trump’s meeting with Russia’s Vladimir Putin provoked broad outrage and revived talk of a Democratic wave in November’s congressional elections.

              Instead, party officials voiced optimism about maintaining control of both the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives this autumn, saying the Democratic Party’s messaging and internal struggles were helping boost Republican prospects.

              In interviews with Reuters, attendees at the Republican National Committee meeting in Austin said pressure from progressives challenging the Democratic old guard following Hillary Clinton’s defeat in the 2016 presidential election had forced many Democrats to adopt more left-leaning positions.

              Republicans hope to exploit such differences.


              more less
              Pundit Post

              NRA Board Member Ted Nugent Bans Guns From His Concert


                  Mind you, Nugent isn't banning guns from all concerts, just his. Talk about hypocrisy. Here is Mr. Tough Guy who actually sits on the board of the NRA banning guns because he is scared someone attending his concert might shoot him? Maybe Ted should have his security just allow those people carrying guns into the concert if they show they are NRA members. Why not? Aren't all NRA members good guys with guns?


                  more less

                  Young People Are Registering To Vote In Huge Numbers, New Study Finds


                      Student protesters at the March for Our Lives in Detroit, Michigan on March 24, 2018.Chirag Wakaskar/SOPA Images via ZUMA Wire


                      This is the future. This is the start of our young Americans showing their willingness to care about what happens in their/our country! This study finds, that in some of our most contested states (battleground states) new voting registrations are overwhelmingly those of people between the ages of 18 and 29.

                      This new study evaluated 39 states, that could supply available data since February 14, 2018 (that was the day of the Parkland mass shooting) and found that all across the country, young people's registrations increased by 2.16 percentage points; and in some states increased between 9 and 16 percentage points.

                      The study has confirmed what many of us have been predicting, since today's youth is not only better informed, but have told us that they are fed up with the lack of gun-safety (mass shootings in schools, at concerts and other events) the glut of dark money financing candidates they don't endorse, and the direction our country has taken in the past 2 years.

                      I support these new voters, and I hope Democratic/Social Democratic Candidates pay attention! The future of our country is at stake.

                      Image result for pictures of multiracial people between 18 and 29

                      The March for Our Lives teens said they’d #VoteThemOut, and a new study suggests they could be poised to do just that. According to the political data firm TargetSmart, the percentage of newly registered voters who are under the age of 30 has grown significantly in a number of key battleground states since the February school shooting in Parkland, Florida. The surge could have big implications in this fall’s fight for control of Congress.

                      The study evaluated all new voter registrations in the 39 states with available data since February 14, 2018—the day of the Parkland shooting—and calculated the change in the share of new registrants who are 18 to 29 years old. Across the country, the share of youth registrants increased by a modest 2.16 percentage points. But in Indiana, Virginia, and New York—home to some of this year’s marquee House and Senate contests—the share of youth registrants increased by 9.87, 10.49, and 10.7 percentage points, respectively. In Pennsylvania—where voters will decide as many as nine competitive congressional races—the share of new registrants who are younger than 30 jumped by a whopping 16.14 percentage points. The study doesn’t evaluate how many of the new registrants may have been motivated by the #NeverAgain movement.

                      The findings offer an early, measurable indication that youth turnout could be higher than in previous midterm elections, though there’s no guarantee that many of the new registrants will actually vote. Just under half of all 18-to-29-year-olds were registered to vote in 2014, but less than 20 percent of that population group ended up casting ballots that year. It was the lowest rate of of youth registration and turnout recorded in four decades, according to the Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning and Engagement at Tufts University.

                      more less
                      Pundit Post

                      Dozens Of Babies Forced To Appear In Immigration Court


                          There's an old saying that a person who represents himself in court has a fool for a client. What about a justice system that requires children to represent themselves in court? Is that justice system foolish? What kind of society would allow that to happen?


                          The Trump administration has reportedly ordered at least 70 children under the age of 1 to appear before immigration judges since last October, with some appearing without any legal representation.

                          Department of Justice data revealed by the Texas Tribune and Kaiser Health News on Wednesday also showed that the number of infants made to appear before immigration judges tripled in 2017 compared to the year before.

                          The newspaper reported that approximately three-fourths of children who have been forced to appear in court have had legal representation to help them make their case that they should be able to remain in the United States

                          The rest have reportedly been left to represent themselves, despite being aged 12 months and under.

                          more less

                              Trump has been a conman all of his life. He lied his way onto the Forbes 400, and with help from Putin, he stole the title as the most powerful man in the world, when in reality he is the most crooked man in the world.

                              Since the 1990s republicans have created a caricature of a devilish women named Hillary Clinton. They even managed to persuade many Democrats to believe the lies they promoted about Hillary. Their fear was that one day she would run for president. So they sought to develop an industry to demonize her so she would be the most disliked politician in the USA.

                              They were so successful that by the time Hillary Clinton won the Democratic nomination for president, even a person who was 100 times worse than the caricature republicans had created, was seemingly a better choice for president than the fictitious Hillary Clinton republicans created.

                              In recent days we have seen how enamored Trump is with dictators, but here is how he became the better of the "binary choice" republicans promoted in 2016. Before we knew about David Dennison, Trump operated as John Baron.

                              These are excerpts for the article. To read the entire article, click on this link.


                              This was a model Trump would use for the rest of his career, telling a lie so cosmic that people believed that some kernel of it had to be real. The tactic landed him a place he hadn’t earned on the Forbes list — and led to future accolades, press coverage and deals. It eventually paved a path toward the presidency.

                              It would be decades before I learned that Forbes had been conned: In the early 1980s, Trump had zero equity in his father’s company. According to Fred’s will (portions of which appeared in a lawsuit), the father retained legal ownership of his residential empire until his death in 1999, at which point he left it to be divided between his four surviving children and some of his grandchildren. That explains why, after Trump’s companies went bankrupt in the early 1990s, he borrowed $30 million from his siblings, secured by an estimated $35 million share of his future inheritance, according to three sources in Tim O’Brien’s 2005 biography, “TrumpNation.” He could have used his own assets as collateral if he’d had any worth that amount, but he didn’t.

                              The most revelatory document describing Trump’s true net worth in the early ’80s was a 1981 report from the New Jersey Casino Control Commission. O’Brien obtained a copy for his book. Trump had applied for an Atlantic City casino license, and regulators were able to review his tax returns and personal and corporate debt, giving them the most accurate picture of his finances. They found that he had an income of about $100,000 a year, while his 1979 tax returns showed a $3.4 million taxable loss. Trump’s personal assets consisted of a $1 million trust fund that Fred Trump provided to each of his children and grandchildren, a few checking accounts with about $400,000 in them and a 1977 Mercedes 450SL. Nowhere did the report list an ownership stake in the Trump Organization’s residential apartments. Trump also possessed a few parcels of valuable but highly leveraged real estate, financed with $22.5 million in debt, all of it secured by his father’s assets. He did not own a safe deposit box or stocks in publicly traded companies. In sum, Trump was worth less than $5 million, not the $100 million that I reported in the first Forbes 400.

                              more less

                              Helsinki, 24 Hours Later - Trump Says He Misspoke.



                                  Hmm - -The hypocrisy is not new, and neither is the lying. Evidently, Trump believes he can have said something more than once, in front of the entire world, and then just brush it off as "I misspoke."

                                  I for one do not believe him for a moment. He has made it perfectly clear that he's with Putin and Russia as opposed to the USA.

                                  He betrayed us all, and he needs to be held accountable. It is tiring seeing him contradict himself and get away with it. He has done it too many times, and this time he's getting called on it!

                                  He NOW claims that he supports our United States Intelligence Community, after thrice stating in Helsinki, on a world wide stage, that he didn't. Who could ever believe him? Well, interestingly, Republicans are already stating that they might believe him. Newt Gingrich gave praise to Trump for making such sad, and insincere, "clarifying" statements.

                                  24 hours later, Trump claims he misspoke in Helsinki, meant to say Russia did have reason to meddle in election

                                  The president also said he backed the U.S. intelligence community's assessment that Moscow interfered in his 2016 race against Hillary Clinton.

                                  President Donald Trump attempted on Tuesday to clarify his widely criticized comments in Helsinki, saying that he had misspoken when he said a day earlier that he did not see why Russia would have meddled in the election. Trump said Tuesday he meant to say he did not see any reason why it wouldn't have been Russia that interfered.

                                  "I thought that I made myself very clear, but having just reviewed the transcript...I realized that there is a need for some clarification," Trump said Tuesday at the White House. "The sentence should have been...'I don't see any reason why it wouldn't be Russia'."



                                  At the Monday press conference with Russian President Vladimir Putin, Trump said about election meddling in 2016: "(Putin) just said it's not Russia. I will say this: I don't see any reason why it would be."

                                  Trump also said on Tuesday that he had "full faith and support" for the American intelligence community and supported their assessment that Russian meddled in the election, although the president also claimed that others could also be responsible.

                                  Democrats swiftly seized on the president's attempt to clarify his comments.

                                  Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., accused Trump of trying to "squirm away" from his comments in Helsinki.

                                  "President Trump tried to squirm away from what he said yesterday. It’s 24 hours too late and in the wrong place," Schumer said.

                                  Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., the vice chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said he wasn't buying it.

                                  "I don't accept the president’s comments today," Warner said. "If he wanted to make those comments, he should have had the strength to make them in front of Vladimir Putin."

                                  He added, "This has a strange resemblance to the president's comments after he was so offensive after the disturbances in Charlottesville where he equated the neo-Nazis with the protesters. So, I give these comments about 24 hours before he once again slams the investigation, before he once again sides with authoritarians like Vladimir Putin."

                                  Trump was pilloried from all sides on Monday, even from some staunch loyalists in his own party, for appearing to side with Putin over American intelligence agencies that have concluded that Russia interfered in the 2016 election.


                                  Referring to the president's news conference with Putin, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said Trump had "one of the most disgraceful performances by an American president in memory."

                                  Former CIA director John Brennan, a frequent Trump critic and a national security analyst for NBC News and MSNBC, called Trump's performance "nothing short of treasonous." And former GOP House Speaker Newt Gingrich, a Trump confidant, called the president's comments "the most serious mistake of his presidency."

                                  Gingrich praised the president for clarifying his comments.

                                  No matter how the GOP tries to twist this one, Trump betrayed our American people every one, and we will remember.


                                  more less
                                  Pundit Post

                                  MGM Resorts Suing Las Vegas Mass Shooting Victims


                                      MGM Resorts Suing Las Vegas

                                      Mass Shooting Victims

                                      ICON SPORTSWIRE VIA GETTY IMAGES

                                      By Ray Cunneff

                                      July 17, 2018

                                      MGM Resorts International has filed federal lawsuits against more than 1,000 Las Vegas mass shooting victims in an effort to avoid liability.

                                      The company, which owns Mandalay Bay and the Route 91 Harvest festival venue, argues that it cannot be held liable for October 1, 2017 deaths, injuries or other damages, adding that any claims against MGM and related parties “must be dismissed”.

                                      MGM Resorts International said in federal lawsuits filed Thursday and Friday that it cannot be held liable for casualties from the attack, which left 58 people dead and hundreds of others injured, when Stephen Paddock opened fire from his 32nd-floor Mandalay Bay suite on the crowd at a Route 91 Harvest concert across the street last year.

                                      According to complaints filed in Nevada and California, they argue the “plaintiffs have no liability of any kind to defendants” because Mandalay Bay adhered to a 2002 federal act extending liability protection to venues that employ anti-terrorism services.

                                      The act cited in the new lawsuits was passed little more than a year after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks and intentionally included broad protections, defining terrorism as any unlawful act inside the United States that causes “mass destruction, injury or other loss.”

                                      Richard Brian Las Vegas Review-Journal

                                      The FBI investigates the scene on the 32nd-floor of the Mandalay Bay

                                      on Wednesday, Oct. 4, 2017, in Las Vegas.

                                      The FBI has not called the Las Vegas mass shooting an act of terrorism because the gunman had no clear motive, and the FBI defines terrorism as an act associated with extremist ideologies of a political, religious, social, racial or environmental nature.

                                      Las Vegas attorney Robert Eglet, who has represented several of the October 1st victims, said he viewed the decision to file the complaints in federal court as a “blatant display of judge-shopping” that “quite frankly verges on unethical.”

                                      Eglet added, I’ve never seen a more outrageous thing, where they sue the victims in an effort to find a judge they like,” he said. “It’s just really sad that they would stoop to this level.”

                                      Attempting to put a positive spin on these lawsuits, an MGM Resorts spokesperson said, “Years of drawn out litigation and hearings are not in the best interest of victims, the community and those still healing.”


                                      more less
                                      Pundit Post

                                          In addition to having a president who is a puppet to Russia, to Bernie Sanders and others, who have promoted the notion that Hillary Clinton and the so-called establishment Democrats were corrupt because they did not unilaterally disarm related to campaign finance, and TRANSPARENTLY accepted donations from PACs and super PACs, THIS is what you chose instead.

                                          Czar Trump has decided that political non-profits, i.e., PACs and super PACs DO NOT have to DISCLOSE their donors. So donations to political campaigns can now come from Putin or anyone who has the money to buy a candidate.


                                          WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Treasury said on Monday that it will no longer require certain tax-exempt organizations including politically active nonprofit groups, such as the National Rifle Association and Planned Parenthood, to identify their financial donors to U.S. tax authorities.

                                          The policy change, heralded by conservatives as an advance for free speech, maintains donor disclosure requirements for traditional charity groups organized to receive tax-exempt donations under a section of the Internal Revenue code known as 501(c)(3), the Treasury said.

                                          But the move frees labor unions, issue advocacy organizations, veterans groups and other nonprofits that do not receive tax-exempt money from meeting confidential disclosure requirements set in place decades ago.

                                          “Americans shouldn’t be required to send the IRS information that it doesn’t need to effectively enforce our tax laws, and the IRS simply does not need tax returns with donor names and addresses to do its job in this area,” U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said in a statement.

                                          The change protects the privacy of wealthy donors of “dark money” donations to politically active groups. Conservatives have complained that the disclosures to the IRS, though not public, were susceptible to media leaks.

                                          The issue of the IRS’s handling of nonprofit political groups exploded into headlines several years ago when the federal tax agency was found to have targeted tax-exempt political groups aligned with the conservative Tea Party movement for greater scrutiny.

                                          “It is important to emphasize that this change will in no way limit transparency,” Mnuchin said. “The same information about tax-exempt organizations that was previously available to the public will continue to be available, while private taxpayer information will be better protected.”

                                          more less

                                          Yabberz Search

                                          Topics Found



                                          Load More Posts
                                          Hi There,

                                          Do you want to quickly add followers, meet new friends, or simply connect with existing contacts to discuss the news?

                                          Do you have an email group that shares news items?

                                          It's now super easy and rewarding to find and add friends on Yabberz.

                                          This post has either already been PowerShared, not eligible for PowerShare or is not your post. Return Home

                                              Click to confirm you are 18 yrs of age or older and open

                                              Click to confirm you want to see post

                                              more less

                                                  more less
                                                  Block User
                                                  This user will be blocked and not see your posts when logged in. You will also not see this user's posts when logged in. In order to later unblock this user, visit the blocked user tab found on your about me profile page. Click confirm block to complete.
                                                  Last Heard: a minute ago
                                                  Joined: Mar 4' 15
                                                  Followers: 100
                                                  Points: 100,000