Yabberz for AndroidDownload


Scales of Justice Weigh Heavily Against Kavanaugh Accuser

Posted: Sep 22, 2018 12:01 AM
The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent the views of Townhall.com.
Scales of Justice Weigh Heavily Against Kavanaugh Accuser

NEW YORK — Brett Kavanaugh, a judge of the highest caliber, now finds himself being judged, although in the decidedly lawless court of public opinion. As such, Kavanaugh, 53, confronts Lady Justice and her pair of scales.

On one side rests Palo Alto University clinical-psychology professor Christine Blasey Ford, 51. She claimed in the Washington Post and in a letter to Senator Dianne Feinstein (D - California) that in the summer of 1982, she attended a party at a home in Montgomery County, Maryland. That evening, Ford said, a “stumbling drunk” Kavanaugh, then 17, threw the then-15-year-old on a bed, mounted her, groped her, and tried to yank off her bathing suit.

“I thought he might inadvertently kill me,” Ford said. “He was trying to attack me and remove my clothing.” Ford said that she tried to scream, but Kavanaugh’s hand muted her mouth.

Ford added that Mark Judge, Kavanaugh’s schoolmate, jumped on the bed and knocked the trio onto the floor; she then escaped.

Ford is befogged about who owned the house in which this boozy soiree supposedly transpired, how she arrived, or how she got home. Why, in contrast, is she so crystal clear that Kavanaugh committed this “rape attempt,” as she described it? At this writing, senators await Ford’s testimony.

“We are doing everything that we can to make Dr. Ford comfortable with coming before our committee either in an open session or a closed session, or a public or a private interview,” Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley (R- Iowa) told journalists on Wednesday. “That’s four different ways she can choose to come.”

Ford currently refuses to speak until the FBI investigates this matter. Why she cannot express herself without FBI intervention is also a mystery.

On the other side, Lady Justice weighs the words of three men:

• “I categorically and unequivocally deny this allegation,” Kavanaugh said September 14. “I did not do this back in high school or at any time.”

“This is a completely false allegation. I have never done anything like what the accuser describes — to her or to anyone,” Kavanaugh said in a statement Monday. “I am willing to talk to the Senate Judiciary Committee in any way the Committee deems appropriate to refute this false allegation, from 36 years ago, and defend my integrity.”

• “Dr. Christine Blasey Ford remembers me as the other person in the room during the alleged assault,” Mark Judge stated Tuesday. “In fact, I have no memory of this alleged incident. Brett Kavanaugh and I were friends in high school but I do not recall the party described in Dr. Ford’s letter. More to the point, I never saw Brett act in the manner Ford describes.”

• “I understand that I have been identified by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford as the person she remembers as ‘PJ’ who supposedly was present at the party she described in her statements to the Washington Post,” Patrick J. Smyth declared to the Senate Judiciary Committee. “I have no knowledge of the party in question; nor do I have any knowledge of the allegations of improper conduct she has leveled against Brett Kavanaugh.”

“Personally speaking, I have known Brett Kavanaugh since high school and I know him to be a person of great integrity, a great friend, and I have never witnessed any improper conduct by Brett Kavanaugh towards women.”

Beside these men, Lady Justice weighs 166 individual women who stand with Kavanaugh. Several open letters — as well as articles and other communications — find women offering Kavanaugh deeply touching, genuinely moving messages of support, friendship, and profound affection.

• “We are women who have known Brett Kavanaugh for more than 35 years and knew him while he attended high school between 1979 and 1983,” 65 different women wrote the Senate Judiciary Committee on September 14. “For the entire time we have known Brett Kavanaugh, he has behaved honorably and treated women with respect.”

“We knew Brett well through social events, sports, church, and various other activities,” they added. “Many of us have remained close friends with him and his family over the years. Through the more than 35 years we have known him, Brett has stood out for his friendship, character, and integrity. In particular, he has always treated women with decency and respect. That was true when he was in high school, and it has remained true to this day.”

• “We are women who served with Brett Kavanaugh in White House staff positions during President George W. Bush’s Administration. We are united in our admiration for Judge Kavanaugh as a public servant and as a person,” 84 more women wrote Judiciary on August 29. “The West Wing is a small place. The hours are long, and the pressure is intense. You get to know your colleagues well in those conditions. And in Brett Kavanaugh, we got to know a brilliant lawyer, a thoughtful friend, and a man of the highest integrity.”

“As former colleagues of Brett’s, we know his commitment to equal treatment of women in the workplace and are especially proud of his efforts to encourage and support women lawyers,” they continued. “More than half of Brett’s law clerks have been women, and he has worked tirelessly to support them in their legal careers.”

• “Each of us has had the privilege of clerking for Judge Brett Kavanaugh on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit,” according to a July 9 letter signed by 34 of Kavanaugh’s clerks — 17 of them women. “Our ranks include Republicans, Democrats, and Independents. But we are united in this: our admiration and fondness for Judge Kavanaugh run deep…This letter is signed by every single one of Judge Kavanaugh’s clerks not prohibited by their current or pending employment from signing…It was a tremendous stroke of luck to work for and be mentored by a person of his strength of character, generosity of spirit, intellectual capacity, and unwavering care for his family, friends, colleagues, and us, his law clerks.”

“Judge Kavanaugh has been a role model to us personally as well as professionally,” the letter continues. “He is grounded and kind. Judge Kavanaugh is a dedicated husband and father to two girls, Liza and Margaret, and an enthusiastic coach of both their youth basketball teams. He has a great sense of humor and an easy laugh. (Some of us are funny, most of us are not, and yet he laughs at all our jokes.)…He makes it to every wedding, answers every career question, and gives unflinchingly honest advice.”

Not in the balance are other women who say that Kavanaugh mistreated them. Paula Jones, Kathleen Willey, and Juanita Brodderick — at a minimum — say that Bill Clinton sexually abused them. Six women reported that former CBS chief Les Moonves misbehaved sexually. Eight women blasted former senator Al Franken (D – Minnesota) as sexually inappropriate. Sixty women condemned fallen comedian Bill Cosby as a sexual predator. Seventy women denounced disgraced film tycoon Harvey Weinstein as a sexual monster.

Where is Brett Kavanaugh’s parade of victims?

The next few days should diffuse much of the smoke that infuses this imbroglio. Things may end entirely differently. But for now, the scales of justice tilt decidedly in Kavanaugh’s favor: 169-1.

more less

TYT Interviews David Duke.

In this well handled interview by Cenk all the right wing anti-Semite tropes are aired and exposed. Courtesy of Duke. (From 2015)

(The cover shot on the video below has been changed somewhere along the line between youtube and here)

In this at times combative interview, an increasingly exasperated Cenk Uygur of The Young Turks listens as Duke goes on at great length attempting to substantiate his claims of a purported Jewish control of the media, the entertainment and banking industries and the US government - all while denying the label of anti-semite.

During the few breaks in his harangue, Duke briefly answers questions about: - Whether he has any sympathy for African-Americans who, like him, claim to be victims of discrimination in the criminal justice system.

Whether black people are more criminally inclined than white people or are simply targeted for arrest more frequently than whites. - If MSNBC is run by a secret Irish-American cabal.

If he feels vindicated by the GOP’s adoption of policies he first pioneered, including the drug-testing of welfare recipients,

Whether all his railing against Zionism isn’t simply jealousy at the successes Jews have achieved while his and other white people’s fortunes have continued to dwindle. Be sure to stay tuned all the way to the end!

more less


Thought provoking Professor.

more less

How To Respond When An Employee Asks, 'Hey Boss, Can You Lend Me $4,000?'


      So how's all that free market capitalism working out for the average American?

      Not too good by all accounts, 70% of millenials are running a balance on their credit cards. Meaning any unplanned expenses could banktupt them.

      There's no such concerns for the extremely wealthy though, when they vote for public representatives they have other goals in mind.

      A common cause for financial distress is the practice of living paycheck-to-paycheck, which affects 49% of men and 56% of women. Indeed, 63% of Americans don't have enough savings to cover a $500 emergency. One manager I spoke to told me that two of the four assistants he’s had over his career have asked him directly for a personal loan due to an unexpected expense or a spouse’s loss of employment.


      more less

      Throw The Art Out


          Throw Your Children’s Art Away

          Annie Otzen / Getty

          Children make art constantly. From the earliest age, adults press crayons into their hands. Art offers kids something to do, and folk wisdom holds that it’s good for them, too. But after the activity is over, the artwork sticks around. And that’s where the problems start.

          My young children leave their art everywhere. I find most of it on the floor. It gets ripped, crumpled, or marked up with footprints. I confront it mostly when bending over to pick it up. Often, I encounter a drift of several layers of drawings, spilling off glitter and painted rice. Others tumble off the refrigerator.

          After a few years, I had a crisis over what to do with it all. I hadn’t yet started the carefully curated collection that I remember my own mother making for me. And in truth, it’s difficult to choose which pieces to keep. “Oh, but we have to keep this one,” I think, every single time. And if this one, why not another?

          Eventually, I started throwing it all away. Perhaps I am a monster. But the relief involved leads me to believe I’m onto something. What parents do with children’s art depends on what they think about the nature of childhood, nostalgia, and beauty.

          The correct answer is to make the art, bestow it upon someone to behold and admire for a while, and then toss it. It makes the right tribute to beauty and it’s the correct moral stance toward the more ephemeral qualities of childhood.

          Debates about the proper way to value and preserve art have existed for millennia. For example, Socrates was known for his willingness to discard all art completely, on the grounds that any representation amounted to a false truth. But Plato, his student, was exceedingly concerned with his own work’s preservation. He went to great lengths to compose art to protect the search for truth.

          Socrates might ask what children gain by making visual art in their earliest years—especially when that art bears little aesthetic value. Does the physical record of youthful attempts contain some virtue, beyond aesthetics, that makes it worth preserving? Is this sort of nostalgia good for the soul, or is it ultimately a weakness that fails to offer satisfaction?

          The beloved Mr. Rogers made a compelling case for the practice of art even when there’s not much personal skill involved. In a phrase now immortalized in meme, he said, “I’m not very good at it, but it feels good to have made something.” This advice continues to resonate, as the trend of adult coloring books attests. Some universities even offer “coloring-book days” for stressed-out undergrads. Whether the art is any good or not, doing it is thought to make kids smarter, more confident, and more emotionally grounded.

          Children’s art does contain some beauty, too. In the movie Six Degrees of Separation, the actor Stockard Channing’s art-world-obsessed husband observes that the local second graders produce what amounts to Matisse after Matisse. There’s something beautifully nonchalant, effortlessly engaging, in each new creation that arrives home from school, proudly presented to parents.

          But there’s also a strange time limit to its freshness, after which this initial impression of ease turns into pathos. At first, something quite marvelous is expressed on the page. But soon enough, everything that is wrong or missing becomes more apparent. In the end, this incompleteness drowns the rest out.

          Eventually, if you’ve looked at it often enough, the art becomes pitiful, emptied of meaning. It remains, at best, a sign that the child has moved on to another equally ephemeral moment of their lives, already coloring on something else. The crisis of children’s art starts here, when the work feels both important and irritating all at once.

          That feeling might just be you contemplating your own mortality. Recently, both my mother and my mother-in-law began grand, house-emptying projects. A steady stream of their discards—boxes full of grade-school medals, ribbons, papers, drawings, and paintings—arrived at my house. After the first box, my husband wanted to throw it all out immediately. As a collection, however, a complete set of our juvenilia, it seemed to me too momentous to get rid of all at once.

          After two boxes, it became too much. The collection demanded a self-reckoning too onerous to undertake. After a while, even the pleasure of looking at it was gone. That’s a bad sign when it comes to art. Real art gives you tools for reflection. But there wasn’t anything left of myself to reckon with in my old art, because the papers I had cast marker or crayon upon at age 5 had never really contained that kind of artistry or inspiration. It produced terror in me rather than comfort to be faced with the sheer volume of time completely forgotten, days spent indoors on a task whose completion went into boxes.

          That’s when I first tried throwing away my own young children’s art. Of course, I felt an ache as I pitched it into the trash. There’s a moment when a child first presents you with their art, holding it out with the last split second of attention they can muster after completing it. That moment contains a burst of pride on both your parts, and a frisson of mutual love. But in the end, your pride lasts longer than the child’s does. Eventually, and soon, it must move on to another venture. Theirs always does, but yours lingers, heartstrings tugged.

          It’s the wish to prolong this moment artificially, I think, that motivates the urge to keep and curate your children’s art for posterity. You convince yourself there’s some future where your child will want to return to that moment of pride and love through the act of witnessing the thing they made so long ago.

          Don’t fall for it. You’re only trying to make yourself feel better. You’ll never quite be able to tell which moment your children will remember, and it’s not as if you can regulate that memory on their behalf anyway. And besides, childhood is made from a thousand moments just like this. There’s no way to hold on to all of them.

          It makes sense to me that, for my parents’ generation—Boomers raised on nostalgia—collecting my art into boxes seemed like time well spent. It was reasonable to guess that I might wish to spend my adult life buried in the past. But I feel differently.

          Nostalgia for youth is probably inevitable. It’s certainly not the vice of any one generation alone, although it can become characteristic of an age. But saving your children’s art stretches the goodwill of even the most powerful nostalgia.

          If it’s the act of making the art that’s useful and good for children, then let this part of the art live, and then let its results die. Like its aesthetic quality, the output of children’s artistic efforts is incomplete. Throwing it away actually does everyone a favor. It completes the artistic life cycle, allowing ephemera to be just that: actually ephemeral. Childhood is like that, too—or that’s how parents ought to think about it. Kids thrash about until a more recognizable self takes hold. Then they turn their attention toward preserving that developing self. The paperwork they produce along the way is mostly a means to that end.

          There’s a point, perhaps around the age of 7, when memory takes over and a self-history starts, where children themselves decide what’s important to them and what isn’t. Of course, you shouldn’t throw something away that your kids say they want to keep. But absent that urge, and particularly in the early years before it develops, most children’s art exists to be destroyed. The point of life isn’t to prolong youth, but to have grown up. That requires discarding things along the way, and enjoying the appropriate relief. That’s the kind of activity a parent ought to put their moral and aesthetic weight behind.

          This post appears courtesy of Object Lessons.

          more less

          America: The Farewell Tour. Chris Hedges


              [Other: Political Philosophy]

              Chris Hedges, in the video posted below, speaking before a library audience, isn't sparing anybody's feelings. We are all nuts. The whole of America. Whereas I often speak on the collapse of the Republican party, he speaks of the downfall of the entire country. He speaks ill of the courts, the political parties, hate faith, Obama, the black listers of old, industry leaders and so on. He is a doomsayer bar none. Frightening, but a good listen. Give it a listen when you get time. It runs for 1 hour and just under 12 minutes.

              more less

              "America The Farewell Tour"


                  Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Chris Hedges talks about his new book.

                  He made a great speech a while back that was posted in "Social Justice"

                  He makes a lot of sense, must see interview.

                  more less

                  Yabberz Search

                  Topics Found



                  Load More Posts
                  Hi There,

                  Do you want to quickly add followers, meet new friends, or simply connect with existing contacts to discuss the news?

                  Do you have an email group that shares news items?

                  It's now super easy and rewarding to find and add friends on Yabberz.

                  This post has either already been PowerShared, not eligible for PowerShare or is not your post. Return Home

                      Click to confirm you are 18 yrs of age or older and open

                      Click to confirm you want to see post

                      more less

                          more less
                          Block User
                          This user will be blocked and not see your posts when logged in. You will also not see this user's posts when logged in. In order to later unblock this user, visit the blocked user tab found on your about me profile page. Click confirm block to complete.
                          Last Heard: a minute ago
                          Joined: Mar 4' 15
                          Followers: 100
                          Points: 100,000