Yabberz for AndroidDownload

Meet The Democrat Who Plans To Unite The Party After 2020 Turns Ugly

Meet Senator Brian Schatz Who Is Rallying White House Hopefuls Around A Series Of Proposals In A Bid To Avoid The ’Toxic Debate’ That Plagued The Democratic Party In 2016.

Brian Schatz heads to a meeting on Capitol Hill with Democratic Senate colleagues Chris Murphy and Cory Booker on June 20, 2017. Photo: Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call,Inc.

Brian Schatz is not interested in running for President of the United states. He wants to remain in the Senate. His interest is in keeping the Democratic Party strongly united. He self describes as a climate hawk and a uniter, and so far at this stage of the campaigns (very early yet) Democratic competitors have held back from attacking one another, which he says makes for better campaigning, especially if they leave personal complaints aside. I agree, and believe that the Right Wing will have enough semi - real and made up personal complaints to keep their base hateful and happy.

Senator Schatz believes that so far, all the Democratic candidates believe in the basic policy changes needed: Affordable college, climate action, getting the economy back on track, which holds people together better than “personality based politics." His intention is to keep the debates and the over all conversation around the campaigns, focused on policy no matter what personal insults the Trump campaign uses to ridicule and degrade.

Whatever happens in the debates, whoever each Democrat, Independent and break away Republican decided to support or who the final vote goes to, I hope this election will see voters coming together and voting in larger numbers than ever before for the Democrat who wins the Primaries. Our country must be saved from Trump/Pence and the authoritarianism that they stand for. It would seem that Senator Schatz thinks so too.

Brian Schatz is no household name. But he's already positioning himself as an influential figure in the 2020 presidential race — someone who can unite the party around a shared agenda even if the primary inevitably turns ugly.

Schatz, the senior senator from Hawaii, says he is eager to help Democrats avoid “that whole stupid, unproductive, toxic debate” of 2016, when voters were seemingly forced to choose between Bernie Sanders’ bold-but-vague proposals and Hillary Clinton’s detailed-but-modest legislative prescriptions.To do so, he’s been consulting with many of his Democratic colleagues running for president, often serving as an informal sounding board for their big ideas. Schatz has also penned his own series of proposals — on health care, climate change and economic inequality — to provide Democrats with a ready-made agenda should they take power in 2020.

And Schatz’s plans are gaining traction with Senate Democrats pursuing the White House.

Sens. Kamala Harris (D-Calif), Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) have all signed on to his proposals to reduce college debt and create a public health insurance option for states. Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) has also endorsed the public option bill; Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) supported it in the previous Congress.

“The last presidential election cycle demonstrated to us that voters are interested in policies, but it’s a challenge,” Schatz said in an interview in his Capitol office. “They don’t believe that we’re going to do anything about the things that we talk about. And so I’m just trying to put a little meat on the bones so that we have something to do.”

Schatz says he doesn’t pressure his colleagues running for president to co-sponsor his plans and is just trying to do his job as a legislator. But after more than six years in the Senate, Schatz has developed a reputation as someone who gets both the policy and politics of an issue, and as a potential future leader in the caucus.

Schatz, a liberal 46-year old, represents a younger generation for the Democratic Party. He takes to Twitter to attack Trump as well as make the occasional pop culture reference.

Schatz said he thinks climate change will help drive younger voters to the polls in 2020, unlike in 2016.
Hillary Clinton was right on the issue, Schatz said, but she “never once made a sort of clarion call to the younger generation saying, ‘This is our moment, we have to take this opportunity to lead internationally.”

“In the end, everybody’s for making college affordable, everybody’s for climate action, everybody’s for trying to get economic equality addressed,” Schatz said. “And so that binds you I think more deeply than this sort of personality-based politics.”

This essay was edited for length. Politco has the full story.


more less
Pundit Post

The Chart: Charges Against Trump Aides - Ari Melber Explains It All


      The Chart: Charges Against Trump Aides

      Ari Melber Explains It All

      MSNBC's Ari Melber

      TheBeat w/Ari Melber

      The Beat Goes On: Manafort, Flynn, Cohen, Stone, Papadopoulos, Gates.

      It's common to compare Trump's legal problems to Nixon's,
      but that itself is a low legal bar. More broadly, Trump has now
      had *more advisers indicted* earlier in his term than
      *any* President in history.
      11:30 AM - 19 Mar 2019

      The "witch hunt" seems to have caught a lot of witches. MSNBC's Ari Melber, legal analyst and host of "The Beat" compares staff and adviser indictments of the Trump, Nixon, Clinton and Obama presidencies.

      examines how despite claims that the Russia probe is a “witch-hunt”, Mueller has proven to be one of the fastest and most effective Special Counsels in U.S. history, racking up indictments at the fastest pace since Watergate.

      more less
      Pundit Post

      Trump's "Very Bad For Democrats" Statements Are Illegal, And Actionable



          Trump's "Tough Friends Will Make It Very Bad For Democrats" Statements Are Illegal And Actionable

          This seed article was chosen more to illustrate how the MSM can distort issues by using misleading headlines than to provide information. You've already got the information, and we all know about this story and the President's statements. Trump did not just say "bikers," he also said military and police.

          To me, the President has at once committed obstruction of justice, and treason, on television.
          The treason is the most obvious, 45* makes clear that he would divide our armed forces and police, or turn the military and police against the Congress. That would set up a fight between the two factions. It could weaken our security, possibly to the point where we would be critically vulnerable to attack from outside. That's treason; but it's the more difficult argument, and the least likely to be actionable.

          But, the 'obstruction of justice' charge is not a difficult argument and it is actionable. It could be included in the current investigation. There is a powerful argument here that could be the straw that breaks the camel's back: In his recent statements, Trump threatened to use the power of his office, and that of the military and police, not for any of the almost countless legitimate reasons he might do so, nor for the quasi-legitimate polical excuses that he thinks he can use them for - but to influence a criminal investigation, any criminal investigation, but this time an investigation into his own alleged criminal activities since his election; crimes not yet subject to statutes of limitations, and not yet hushed-up by court order. That is obstruction of justice, and extortion, respectively. Why would you say what Trump said, except to interfere in, or stop altogether, the investigations?

          They can't even make the argument that this is just Trump making threats but that he didn't actually commit a crime: We saw the crime committed, as it was committed. Trump told us the motive as part of the act.

          This isn't just about Trump now. We're fighting for the survival of the "Rule of Law," and it's touch and go at the moment. This latest attack could be interpreted to mean that Trump thinks he's ready to take on the Judiciary head on. I don't buy it: I'd guess that he's losing support, even from within the Mafia, and is desperate to retain power. The moment he leaves the White House, he will likely be arrested.
          more less

          Obama WH Counsel Faces Possible Prosecution In Mueller-initiated Probe

              Former Obama White House Counsel Greg Craig may soon be charged by the Justice Department for engaging in illegal unregistered overseas lobbying, in a case initially probed by Special Counsel Robert Mueller -- a development that would make him the first Democrat to face prosecution in the long-running Russia investigation.
              more less

              Yabberz Search

              Topics Found



              Load More Posts
              Hi There,

              Do you want to quickly add followers, meet new friends, or simply connect with existing contacts to discuss the news?

              Do you have an email group that shares news items?

              It's now super easy and rewarding to find and add friends on Yabberz.

              This post has either already been PowerShared, not eligible for PowerShare or is not your post. Return Home

                  Click to confirm you are 18 yrs of age or older and open

                  Click to confirm you want to see post

                  more less

                      more less
                      Block User
                      This user will be blocked and not see your posts when logged in. You will also not see this user's posts when logged in. In order to later unblock this user, visit the blocked user tab found on your about me profile page. Click confirm block to complete.
                      Last Heard: a minute ago
                      Joined: Mar 4' 15
                      Followers: 100
                      Points: 100,000