Yabberz for AndroidDownload
230

      They Didn't Come For Our Guns

      one month ago

      Click to confirm you are 18 yrs of age or older and open

      Click to confirm you want to see post

      They will come for our guns, they will ban your right to protecting your way of life...

      The right has used that term and similar ones for decades. The fear of thy neighbor has always been the bootlace that ties all of the angst together. In an almost cult-like manner, the zombie voters of the right march right along, it's about the guns. Because we have enemies, there will always be enemies, and things to fight. With our guns and raw power, there's no way to lose... right?

      Quartz - Three percent of the population own half of the civilian guns in the US - Youyou Zhou

      This fear campaign started off years ago, this clipping at the frayed edges of the securities people felt they had. There is something visceral and almost drug inducing in the power that those weapons of destruction carry. It is as close to religion as some may get and in some cases that's just fine with them, it is religious, Biblical. I am afraid to think what some of our religious brethren have put into the minds of those in other parts of the world in their efforts to "spread the word." Witnessing the aftermath of the New Zealand massacre, and all of the multiple shootings there have been it would be easy to condemn the guns again, because that is what we are educated to do.

      teaching-311356_640

      Clker-Free-Vector-Images

      We are going to rail against the "gun," in all its forms, social, political, and reality vs imaginations. The political whipping trail goes somewhere back to the early 70's when the Feds killed an NRA member and everything changed. The gun culture at that time definitely took a turn for the darker, the ownership and necessity was socially breakable at that time, people were too scared though, all of this race and violence they were being exposed to on TV and in real life. It was not an easy time with miles long lines at gas stations and rioting in the streets.

      N.P.R. The NRA Wasn't Always Against Gun Restrictions - Ron Elving

      "In 1971, agents of the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms killed an NRA member who was hiding a large number of illegal weapons. This, too, stirred a restive reaction within the NRA rank and file. To address it, the NRA's top managers created the group's first lobbying organ, the Institute for Legislative Action, in 1975."

      The Second Amendment, and gun advocacy changed in a matter of months. The NRA was not going to work with the Government any longer, at least not where compliance comes into the picture. The growing number of guns owned by Americans were not a novelty any longer, it was a ingredient for division and it was going to be used, and abused.

      My Father once stated that nobody wanted to invade the USA because we had so many guns, and a standing army could be gathered up out of civilians in a heartbeat. The latter phrase the one that sticks in my head today, a standing army, in a heartbeat. So with the Cold War going on it was all about security and piece of mind, guns were good to keep those dang red commies out of our democracy. The Constitution was safe from those commies, either from overseas or the ones here, the guns were saved and with them our future secure... Is how the story is supposed to go. But that Constitution had some other things in it that held up our democracy with more than brute power. Those things that we live with everyday, those smaller bits that may go unnoticed.

      silhouette-1695960_640

      As the world was introduced to these little machines that derive their power by our ability to program them, we gained an entire universe of new worlds. We also, in many ways, gave up on the real, the tangible, and the truth as well in this world. Because all of the things on those little machines were not what they were made out to be, unreal, unsubstantiated, and mostly untrue. In the process, division and lack of civility bum rushed the stage, the term ugly American was made out to be a truism, and Photo by Alex Kovalerov

      the world began to turn its back on our holier than thou attitudes. It wasn't our guns though, or our religions they were after, it wasn't our inalienable rights. It was something much simpler than that, something much more a part of the country and way of life than we could ever imagine.

      Right now the world is also talking about vaccines, some are trying to claim that an injection as a child for blank or blank will cause autism or some other condition to develop. We know that if you are not vaccinated, your chances for developing troubling and incurable conditions rise dramatically. There is that whole cause and effect, that whole business about knowing better because we are intelligent souls, civilized. We also know that if you don't know better you may go ahead and ingest that Tide pod, or try out that latest illicit drug or some old ones, because we are intelligent souls, civilized... That does leave us with the understanding that there are connections to the little things that the bigger issues arise. So, with a tick bite back about forty years ago, the real assault on our security, the real unravelling began and continues today unnoticed by many.

      Before that Second Amendment, which is actually supported in the 14th, so that is the amendment that should be protected if they want their guns. There is the first amendment, and the foundation of our country starts there.

      "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

      The First Amendment guarantees freedoms concerning religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition. It forbids Congress from both promoting one religion over others and also restricting an individual’s religious practices. It guarantees freedom of expression by prohibiting Congress from restricting the press or the rights of individuals to speak freely. It also guarantees the right of citizens to assemble peaceably and to petition their government.

      Cornell - First Amendment

      The links in the previous text should sound the alarm, they are links to the definitions that have been argued about each part of the amendment. There is one glaring omission in them though. That part about the free press, that piece of our foundation that has been eaten away at by the Termites of progress, the lawyers of corporatocracy, and the willingness of a country to turn away from its best defences against disease and forget where we came from. Now, before running away with the thought that, "Oh, it isn't about that at all," there is a cause and effect, and those wishing us harm will simply supply the tick. They are not on a schedule, we are though.

      Vanishing Newspapers: The United States has lost almost 1,800 papers since 2004, including more than 60 dailies and 1,700 weeklies. Roughly half of the remaining 7,112 in the country – 1,283 dailies and 5,829 weeklies – are located in small and rural communities. The vast majority – around 5,500 – have a circulation of less than 15,000.

      https://www.usnewsdeserts.com/reports/expanding-news-desert/loss-of-local-news/loss-newspapers-readers/

      Waketech.edu: “The Decline in Newspapers: A Closer Look” Joseph Ahrens

      Local and relevant reporting, watch dogs all of us. I remember reading a paper front to back, every word, looking for those insights. I am capable of using my own intellect, my own abilities because of that...training, that education. Those very watchdogs got pushed out, pushed away and silenced. The voices of the people, the communities and impacts that every local thing delivers was sent off to a .www address and forgotten among the lights and fancy clickbait. The free-press is now deceased in America, and being relegated to a subjective posture of revenue before the facts. When advertisers are their only revenue, they will cater to that revenue. If you stop getting paid for the work you do, you look for a new job, or new way to get paid... papers are no different.

      The reason this is so dang important in the bigger picture is this. If there ever was a delivery system that could later bring you down to your knees an inoculation ... this is it for a democracy like ours. Our securities have always been in our communities, in the place we live and the people that live there. The local papers would paint that picture of the community quite well, and corrected quickly by readers if incorrect. That tie, that connection has been systematically snipped, cut and taken over in the process. The larger regional papers are gone as well, sucked up into the monopoly of information, the conglomerates and revenue. It wasn't the guns they were after, it wasn't our power to fight, but our ability to coalesce, to create that standing army. Why, what better way to "fight" your enemy than to make them fight themselves. This is America, this is now, and this is bigger than the knee-jerk reactions and emotions that develop after tragedies.

      The five foundations, or basic principles, of democracy are social equality, majority rule, minority rights, freedom and integrity. All of these have a common basis in the fundamental ethical principle of mutual respect for diversity.

      Every single basic principle above relies in some form on the ability to communicate, ability to inquire, and the ability to redress. In each of them, local and regional papers and those "responsible" for its publishing are allowed protections under the first amendment. When those powers are diluted to the corporations responsible, to the businesses responsible, then there is no responsibility to the local communities and expenditures are cut, people are cut-off, and so are communities. In today's comments about tribes of political and ideological people, I guess we are going back to smoke signals as far progress goes. The securities we thought we knew are getting thinner, and it has nothing to do with guns. It has everything to do with us, with others meddling, and with an entitlement that will leave us never quite knowing how it all came apart. The symptoms belie the cause.

      This may come as a surprise, that because of a little shot when you were younger, you didn't have to suffer through some horrible conditions and diseases. The things that secured your life were more than likely not guns, but built upon those times when they were needed. Those primary foundations of democracy and the Revolution that was rife with little local papers, they told our stories, our wishes, and our concerns. Creating a condition where our voices ring hollow in the chasms between us is the easiest and most diabolical way of poisoning a people. A Tower of Babel has been built, and it was built with the bones of those local papers, those local watchdogs, those voiceless citizens. It will continue to grow until it falls, or we do, separating and dividing us even more so than today. They didn't come for our guns...

      TOP 10 REVOLUTIONARY WAR NEWSPAPERS,



      Cheers!



      more
      60
          Hobbes
          one month ago

          Click to confirm you are 18 yrs of age or older and open

          Click to confirm you want to see post

          This post caused me to do something I can't remember doing before. I shared one of the provided links, to a news article (Quartz), on my Facebook page.

          I found it astounding that 3% of the population own half of all the guns in civilian hands and that just 25 percent of the population own all of the guns in civilian hands. Wow!

          It so knocked me on my ass I didn't finish reading the remainder of your post, which I noticed you said really isn't about guns.

          more less
          30
              Hobbes
              one month ago

              Click to confirm you are 18 yrs of age or older and open

              Click to confirm you want to see post

              This is why I don't write for here past a simple copy paste and maybe an opinion. I would have hoped someone would have read it, seeing it really wasn't about our guns. Take care, I will stop back by when you aren't all too busy.

              more less
              70
                  Hobbes
                  one month ago

                  Click to confirm you are 18 yrs of age or older and open

                  Click to confirm you want to see post

                  Hobbes, you covered a lot of territory, but it included guns along with opinion about our loss of news papers, the world turning away from us, thoughts about our 1st and2nd Amendments, vaccines, how we divide and separate, loss of familiar methods of communication and more, and that we don’t understand how it crumbled and fell apart.

                  "It wasn't the guns they were after, it wasn't our power to fight, but our ability to coalesce, to create that standing army. Why, what better way to "fight" your enemy than to make them fight themselves. This is America, this is now, and this is bigger than the knee-jerk reactions and emotions that develop after tragedies."

                  Evidently some of us disappoint you with our responses because we have tried so hard, for so long, for some good gun laws. I chose to focus on that. I am sorry it disappoints you.

                  Yes, we fight each other. Divide and conquer. But we will overcome.

                  more less
                  0

                      Click to confirm you are 18 yrs of age or older and open

                      Click to confirm you want to see post

                      80
                          Hobbes
                          one month ago

                          Click to confirm you are 18 yrs of age or older and open

                          Click to confirm you want to see post

                          It happens to the best of us. The most known writer of the group --as far as I know-- once made a similar comment. He spoke about how his more well thought out writings posted to Yabberz garnered less attention, fewer replies, than did the regular fodder. And if it was worth the effort. I put forth the opinion that it isn't that the words one has vested herself and time to aren't worthy or aren't being read, it can be, and often is true, that the words and the thoughts they convey are so well put together it leaves the reader speechless, at a loss for words. Thus they generate far fewer replies. It is like reading a well done magazine article at home, when you are done you put it aside, you don't comment on it or write a letter to the editor.

                          more less
                          0

                              Click to confirm you are 18 yrs of age or older and open

                              Click to confirm you want to see post

                              70
                                  Hobbes
                                  one month ago

                                  Click to confirm you are 18 yrs of age or older and open

                                  Click to confirm you want to see post

                                  So, if 3% of the population owns 50% of the guns, let's just take the guns away from that crazy 3%. 97% of the people shouldn't mind that. ;-)

                                  more less
                                  10
                                      Journeyman
                                      one month ago

                                      Click to confirm you are 18 yrs of age or older and open

                                      Click to confirm you want to see post

                                      Bah Humbug. I question the stats on who owns the guns. Many people own guns that are not registered. Guns that were passed down from one generation to the next. And the crooks get their guns from dubious sources not from registered guy sellers. Most all of my semi auto pistols are registered most likely. My AR15 is registered but my Bolt Action Rifle may or may not be registered. I bought it from a gun dealer back in the 1970's so I'm not sure if it's registered with the US Fed Gov or not. But there are many people with handguns that are not registered with the Fed Gov. So how can anyone know how many people in the USA have a gun with any accuracy. So the 3% of the population owning 50% of the guns is dubious at best and wholly inaccurate most likely

                                      more less
                                      0

                                          Click to confirm you are 18 yrs of age or older and open

                                          Click to confirm you want to see post

                                          80
                                              Hobbes
                                              one month ago

                                              Click to confirm you are 18 yrs of age or older and open

                                              Click to confirm you want to see post

                                              S/S.

                                              Americans fighting for common-sense reforms to reduce gun violence have been vilified long enough.

                                              Mass gun killings have increased. That we let the NRA rule us is beyond belief.

                                              We WANT responsible, adult gun owners to have their guns. Common sense safety reforms do not mean that we are "coming for their guns."

                                              more less
                                              0
                                                  opie
                                                  one month ago

                                                  Click to confirm you are 18 yrs of age or older and open

                                                  Click to confirm you want to see post

                                                  National Rifle Association was formed to promote gun safety not gun violence. We should not vilify the NRA IMHO. They are not the bad guys. I don't belong to the NRA as I'm too cheap to pay the dues. But my best friend from college is a NRA member and also the director of the Indiana Department of Natural Resources Fish and Wildlife Agency and a great guy. He likes to shoot rifles and joined the NRA so that he could go to the rifle range and learn to shoot properly and more accurately. The NRA helped the new army guys shoot better during WWI and after WWI helped train people to shoot rifles. The NRA promotes gun safety. What is wrong with that? Nothing.


                                                  We should blame the people that don't belong to the NRA and that go nuts and take a gun and use it improperly. And these people get punished. I'm all for punishing people; that use a gun to commit a crime. People that use a gun in the commission of a felony get more jail time as a deterrent.


                                                  Pretty soon the US Supreme Court will have more to say about Gun and the governments suppression of gun ownership and use. We will see in the next year or so how the SCOTUS rules on the New York Rifle and Pistol Club vs the City of New York case.

                                                  more less
                                                  0

                                                      Click to confirm you are 18 yrs of age or older and open

                                                      Click to confirm you want to see post

                                                      Yabberz Search

                                                      Topics Found

                                                      Members

                                                      Posts

                                                      Load More Posts
                                                      Hi There,

                                                      Do you want to quickly add followers, meet new friends, or simply connect with existing contacts to discuss the news?

                                                      Do you have an email group that shares news items?

                                                      It's now super easy and rewarding to find and add friends on Yabberz.

                                                      This post has either already been PowerShared, not eligible for PowerShare or is not your post. Return Home
                                                      0

                                                          Click to confirm you are 18 yrs of age or older and open

                                                          Click to confirm you want to see post

                                                          more less

                                                          Posts
                                                          Points
                                                          Users
                                                              more less
                                                              Block User
                                                              This user will be blocked and not see your posts when logged in. You will also not see this user's posts when logged in. In order to later unblock this user, visit the blocked user tab found on your about me profile page. Click confirm block to complete.
                                                              loading...
                                                              Last Heard: a minute ago
                                                              Joined: Mar 4' 15
                                                              Followers: 100
                                                              Points: 100,000